Contracts in India are governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which outlines the legal framework for agreements. This article explores the validity of contracts entered into by minors under Indian law, examining key judicial precedents and statutory provisions.
The Indian Contract Act, 1872, enacted on 25th April 1872, forms the basis for contractual agreements in India. According to Section 2(h) of the Act, a contract is defined as "an agreement enforceable by law." This sets the stage for understanding the enforceability of agreements under Indian law.
Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act lays down the essentials of a valid contract, emphasizing free consent, lawful consideration, lawful object, and absence of declarations rendering the contract void.
Under Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, 1875, a person attains majority at the age of 18 years. This statute is pivotal in determining the legal capacity of minors to enter into contracts.
Several landmark cases have shaped the understanding of minor's contracts in India:
Section 33 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, addresses restitution concerning contracts where minors have misrepresented their age. It provides guidelines for courts to enforce equitable remedies based on the principles of fairness.
Certain agreements beneficial to minors are upheld, including apprenticeships and agency contracts. These exceptions recognize the potential benefits to minors in specific contractual relationships.
Leave a comment