The inclusion of communities in the Scheduled Tribes (ST) list in India is a structured process guided by specific criteria and modalities. This ensures that only those communities which genuinely require special assistance and protection are included in the list. Here, we will explore the guidelines, the process of inclusion, and the state-wise status of pending proposals.
The Government of India has established clear criteria for the inclusion of communities in the ST list. These criteria are as follows:
The Government of India, through notifications dated 15.6.1999 and further amended on 25.6.2002, has laid down the procedures for the inclusion, exclusion, and modification in the ST list. According to these modalities:
The following communities have been included in the ST list in recent years:
Name of State Name of Community Included Name of Act Chhattisgarh (a) Abhuj Maria at entry 16 Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order (Amendment) Act, 2013 (No. 24 of 2013) dated 18-9-2013 (b) Hill Korwa at entry 27 Kerala Marati (of the Hosdurg and Kasargod Taluks of Kasargod District) at entry 28 Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order (Amendment) Act, 2013 (No. 24 of 2013) dated 18-9-2013
No community has been removed from the ST list since 2013.
As of the latest update, several proposals for the inclusion of communities in the ST list are still pending. The state-wise breakdown is as follows:
S.No. Name of the State/UT Number of Proposals 1 Andhra Pradesh 2 2 Assam 45 3 Arunachal Pradesh 6 4 Bihar 5 5 Chhattisgarh 44 6 Goa 2 7 Jammu & Kashmir 2 8 Jharkhand 17 9 Karnataka 53 10 Kerala 4 11 Madhya Pradesh 14 12 Odisha 85 13 Punjab 41 14 Sikkim 11 15 Tamil Nadu 12 16 Tripura 1 17 Uttarakhand 1 18 Uttar Pradesh 7 19 West Bengal 12 20 Puducherry 7
The process of including communities in the Scheduled Tribes list is comprehensive and rigorous, ensuring that only those communities in genuine need of protection and assistance are included. The criteria and modalities are designed to be thorough, involving multiple levels of review and concurrence before any legislative amendments are made. With several proposals still pending, it is evident that this is an ongoing process requiring continuous evaluation and adjustment.
Leave a comment