Feedback

Detailed Guide to Inclusion in the Scheduled Tribes List in India

The inclusion of communities in the Scheduled Tribes (ST) list is a critical process that ensures the recognition and protection of the most marginalized groups in India. The Government of India has established specific guidelines and procedures to determine which communities qualify for ST status. This article provides a detailed overview of these guidelines, recent proposals, and the current status of pending recommendations.

Criteria for Inclusion in the ST List

The Government of India has laid down clear criteria for the inclusion of any community in the Scheduled Tribes list. These criteria are designed to ensure that only those communities that truly require support and protection are included. The criteria include:

  1. Indications of Primitive Traits: The community should exhibit primitive traits that distinguish them from the mainstream population.
  2. Distinctive Culture: The community should have a distinctive culture, including customs, traditions, and beliefs.
  3. Geographical Isolation: The community should be geographically isolated from the mainstream.
  4. Shyness of Contact with the Community at Large: The community should exhibit a shyness of contact with the larger community.
  5. Backwardness: The community should be socio-economically backward.

Government Guidelines and Modalities

The Government of India has laid down the modalities for determining the claims for inclusion, exclusion, and other modifications in the orders specifying the lists of Scheduled Tribes. These guidelines were first established on 15th June 1999 and further amended on 25th June 2002. According to these modalities, only proposals recommended and justified by the concerned State Government, and concurred with by the Registrar General of India (RGI) and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST), are considered for amendment of legislation.

Recent Proposals and Inclusions

The Union Government has received several proposals from various State Governments for the inclusion of different communities in the ST list. Below are some recent inclusions:

Chhattisgarh:

  • Abhuj Maria (Entry 16)
  • Hill Korwa (Entry 27)
  • Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order (Amendment) Act, 2013 (No. 24 of 2013) dated 18-9-2013

Kerala:

  • Marati (of the Hosdurg and Kasargod Taluks of Kasargod District) at Entry 28

No community has been removed from the ST list since the year 2013.

Pending Proposals

Numerous recommendations for the inclusion of tribes in the ST list are still pending with the government. These proposals are processed in accordance with the established modalities. The table below provides a

 

give full article again

 

2/2

ChatGPT

Detailed Guide to Inclusion in the Scheduled Tribes List in India

Introduction

The inclusion of communities in the Scheduled Tribes (ST) list is a crucial process that ensures the recognition and protection of the most marginalized groups in India. The Government of India has established specific guidelines and procedures to determine which communities qualify for ST status. This article provides a detailed overview of these guidelines, recent proposals, and the current status of pending recommendations.

Criteria for Inclusion in the ST List

The Government of India has laid down clear criteria for the inclusion of any community in the Scheduled Tribes list. These criteria are designed to ensure that only those communities that truly require support and protection are included. The criteria include:

  1. Indications of Primitive Traits: The community should exhibit primitive traits that distinguish them from the mainstream population.
  2. Distinctive Culture: The community should have a distinctive culture, including customs, traditions, and beliefs.
  3. Geographical Isolation: The community should be geographically isolated from the mainstream.
  4. Shyness of Contact with the Community at Large: The community should exhibit a shyness of contact with the larger community.
  5. Backwardness: The community should be socio-economically backward.

Government Guidelines and Modalities

The Government of India has laid down the modalities for determining the claims for inclusion, exclusion, and other modifications in the orders specifying the lists of Scheduled Tribes. These guidelines were first established on 15th June 1999 and further amended on 25th June 2002. According to these modalities, only proposals recommended and justified by the concerned State Government, and concurred with by the Registrar General of India (RGI) and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST), are considered for amendment of legislation.

Recent Proposals and Inclusions

The Union Government has received several proposals from various State Governments for the inclusion of different communities in the ST list. Below are some recent inclusions:

Chhattisgarh:

  • Abhuj Maria (Entry 16)
  • Hill Korwa (Entry 27)
  • Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order (Amendment) Act, 2013 (No. 24 of 2013) dated 18-9-2013

Kerala:

  • Marati (of the Hosdurg and Kasargod Taluks of Kasargod District) at Entry 28

No community has been removed from the ST list since the year 2013.

Pending Proposals

Numerous recommendations for the inclusion of tribes in the ST list are still pending with the government. These proposals are processed in accordance with the established modalities. The table below provides a state-wise breakdown of the pending proposals:

S. No.Name of the State/UTNumber of Proposals
1Andhra Pradesh2
2Assam45
3Arunachal Pradesh6
4Bihar5
5Chhattisgarh44
6Goa2
7Jammu & Kashmir2
8Jharkhand17
9Karnataka53
10Kerala4
11Madhya Pradesh14
12Odisha85
13Punjab41
14Sikkim11
15Tamil Nadu12
16Tripura1
17Uttarakhand1
18Uttar Pradesh7
19West Bengal12
20Puducherry7

Conclusion

The inclusion of communities in the Scheduled Tribes list is a meticulous process guided by strict criteria and established guidelines. The government's efforts to update and maintain the ST list ensure that deserving communities receive the recognition and support they need. With numerous proposals still pending, it is crucial for the concerned authorities to expedite the process to bring about timely inclusion and provide the necessary benefits to these communities.

By understanding these guidelines and the current status of various proposals, stakeholders can better appreciate the complexities involved in the inclusion process and advocate for the rightful recognition of marginalized communities.

0 Comments

Leave a comment