Feedback

Block-Wise Rural Population in District Shimla in the Years 1991 and 2001

Understanding the distribution of the rural population in District Shimla is crucial for planning and resource allocation. This article provides a detailed overview of the block-wise rural population in Shimla for the years 1991 and 2001, highlighting significant trends and changes over the decade.

Rural Population Distribution by Block

The following table summarizes the rural population data for each block in Shimla District for the years 1991 and 2001, along with the percentage decadal variation.

Block	1991 Rural Population	% of Total Rural Population (1991)	2001 Rural Population	% of Total Rural Population (2001)	% Decadal Variation
Rampur	76,159	15.50%	91,527	16.48%	+20.18%
Narkanda	39,174	7.97%	39,864	7.17%	+1.76%
Theog	65,981	13.43%	74,200	13.36%	+12.46%
Mashobra	98,918	20.13%	75,136	13.53%	-24.04%
Chopal	65,188	13.27%	74,903	13.48%	+14.90%
Jubbal-Kotkhai	62,997	12.82%	65,309	11.76%	+3.67%
Rohru	45,004	9.16%	50,870	9.16%	+13.03%
Chhohara	37,851	7.70%	45,177	8.13%	+19.35%
Basantpur	-	-	38,283	6.89%	-
Total	491,272	100%	555,269	100%	+13.02%

Key Observations

Rampur Block: The rural population increased significantly by 20.18%, making Rampur one of the blocks with the highest population growth. The share of the total rural population increased from 15.50% in 1991 to 16.48% in 2001.

Narkanda Block: This block saw a minimal increase in its rural population by 1.76%, indicating relatively stable population dynamics.

Mashobra Block: Notably, Mashobra experienced a significant decline in its rural population by 24.04%, reducing its share from 20.13% in 1991 to 13.53% in 2001.

Chhohara Block: This block recorded one of the highest increases in rural population, with a 19.35% growth over the decade.

Basantpur Block: Population data for Basantpur was reported for the first time in 2001, accounting for 6.89% of the total rural population.

Overall Rural Population Growth: The total rural population in Shimla increased by 13.02% from 491,272 in 1991 to 555,269 in 2001.

Analysis

• Growth Trends: Blocks like Rampur, Chhohara, and Chopal showed significant population growth, indicating better living conditions and possibly economic opportunities that attracted more residents.
• Decline in Mashobra: The decline in Mashobra's rural population could be due to urbanization or migration to other areas within or outside the district.
• Stable Blocks: Narkanda and Jubbal-Kotkhai exhibited relatively stable population trends with minimal increases, suggesting stable living conditions without significant migration.

Conclusion The block-wise analysis of the rural population in Shimla District from 1991 to 2001 highlights diverse trends across different regions. While some blocks experienced significant growth, others saw declines or stable populations. These insights are essential for targeted developmental planning and resource allocation to address the specific needs of each block.